Wednesday 24 February 2016

Introduction


SEO is regarded as the process in which the visibility of the website of a particular brand in the search engine is affected which in further results in improving the brand image of that brand. The higher the brand rank in the SEO the higher the attractiveness and its awareness which results in increasing the site usage of that brand. So, in this assignment I am going to compare two shoes brands named lacoste vs woodland in order to find that which brand is good. Through these findings we should find out which brand has a stronger Search Engine Optimization.

lacoste website


SEO Considerations

locastae

 

URL:

http://www.lacoste.com/ca/en/lacoste/?utm_source=bing&utm_medium=cpc&utm_term=lacoste&utm_campaign=B_Lacoste%20CA%20-%20Brand%20Alone&utm_content=Alone_Ph&c3apiks=360_2144&s_kw=lacoste&s_cat=B_Lacoste%20CA%20-%20Brand%20Alone&s_ag=Alone_Ph&s_e=bing
Keywords used on each site:
Formal shoes ,outdoor shoes,sneakers
o
Almost 10
Locations of keywords:
Extreme left corner
Keywords in URL:

Lacoste
<title>

Locastae shoes
<meta name="description" content=“”/>
<html lang="en"><head><meta charset="utf-8" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1"><script>var
<meta name="keywords" content=""/>
Not available in the source.
Site upload speed:


Quality of written content:
Quality is similar as compare to woodland
Quality of Visual Content:
Design quality is quite attractive
Alt Text used:

19 alt text attributes
Captions used:

Not available
Quality of Layout:


The quality of layout is good and they also had the good background and text colors.
Call-to-action:

Not available.
Mobile Friendly:

The webpage is totally optimized for mobile visitors
Content is “shareable”:

No sharing option is made available.
Links to Social Media:

Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/LacosteUS/?brand_redir=25440047420
Twitter:
https://twitter.com/LACOSTE
You tube
https://www.youtube.com/user/lacosteofficial
SERP ranking results when using keywords from this table:
72%out of 100

 





woodland


SEO Considerations

woodland

locastae

 

URL:

https://ca.images.search.yahoo.com/search/images;_ylt=AwrBTv4S9sNW.oEAh3HrFAx.;_ylu=X3oDMTB0N2Noc21lBGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDBHNlYwNwaXZz?p=woodland+official+site&fr=mcafee&fr2=piv-web
http://www.lacoste.com/ca/en/lacoste/?utm_source=bing&utm_medium=cpc&utm_term=lacoste&utm_campaign=B_Lacoste%20CA%20-%20Brand%20Alone&utm_content=Alone_Ph&c3apiks=360_2144&s_kw=lacoste&s_cat=B_Lacoste%20CA%20-%20Brand%20Alone&s_ag=Alone_Ph&s_e=bing
Keywords used on each site:
Formal shoes, snow shoes
Formal shoes ,outdoor shoes,sneakers
o
8 to 10
Almost 10
Locations of keywords:
Right behind the image
Extreme left corner
Keywords in URL:

Woodland, shoes
Lacoste
<title>

Woodland shoes
Locastae shoes
<meta name="description" content=“”/>
</title><meta name="Google-site-verification" content="Gel1RTT2rzCV81NTbsOeQnMOQFHby0gD3YdkxBFSmQo" /><link href="css/style.css" rel="stylesheet" /><link





<html lang="en"><head><meta charset="utf-8" /><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1"><script>var
<meta name="keywords" content=""/>
Not available
Not available in the source.
Site upload speed:

`

Quality of written content:
The logo is clearly visible
Quality is similar as compare to woodland
Quality of Visual Content:
Good and attractive
Design quality is quite attractive
Alt Text used:

17 Alt text attributes.
19 alt text attributes
Captions used:

Not Available
Not available
Quality of Layout:

The background and the text used is good as it is not too light and there is no extra designs on the webpage. So, overall the quality of layout is good.

The quality of layout is good and they also had the good background and text colors.
Call-to-action:

Not available.
Not available.
Mobile Friendly:

Website is mobile friendly as there is no embedded objects found.
The webpage is totally optimized for mobile visitors
Content is “shareable”:

No sharing option is made available.
No sharing option is made available.
Links to Social Media:

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thewoodlandsmusic
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Woodland_shoes
YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1sNeV85bbE
Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/LacosteUS/?brand_redir=25440047420
Twitter:
https://twitter.com/LACOSTE
You tube
https://www.youtube.com/user/lacosteofficial
SERP ranking results when using keywords from this table:
70%out of 100
72%out of 100

 Summary:

For the lacostae, their main strengths that impacts their image is their organized web page which is very attractive to everyone and for the woodlandtheir main strength is the amount of information that they provide on their website for different style of their brand.. Talking about the quality of visual and written content, both of them are similar to each other and in the google trends most of the research regarding both of these is done near the new year and Christmas days.

Conclusion:

Overall, both woodland and lacoste shoes brands had strong impact on their customer’s minds. But talking about the superiority I think lacote is the winner of the SEO search analysis as their website is more organized and their background and SERP ranking is also more than the woodland

Introduction

SEO is regarded as the process in which the visibility of the website of a particular brand in the search engine is affected which in further results in improving the brand image. The higher the brand rank in the SEO the higher the attractiveness and its awareness which results in increasing the site usage of that brand. So, in this assignment I am going to compare two shoes brands named Puma and Reebok in order to find that which brand is good. Through these findings we should find out which brand has a stronger Search Engine Optimization. 

Puma Website












URL
http://ca.puma.com/en_CA/home?mktId=PS:JDigital:Adwords:CA|Brand|X|PUMA|Exact&gclid=Cj0KEQiArou2BRDcoN_c6NDI3oMBEiQANeix5qjIbIogbIu99s3NpcZYj3X_iQ3sQYUY2HccWk8RLSUaAlM48P8HAQ
Keywords used on each site:
Athletic shoes, formal shoes, Sneakers
Frequency of Keywords:
7to8
Locations of keywords
Both side of the page
Keywords in URL:

Athletic shoes, formal shoes, Sneakers
<title>

Puma Shoes
<meta name="description" content=“”/>
<meta name="description" content="Shop the largest selection of PUMA&reg; styles online including shoes, running gear, &amp; more. Plus: Free Shipping with min. purchase &amp; Free Returns on all US orders." />

<meta name="keywords" content=""/>
<meta name="keywords" content="Puma CA" />

Site upload speed:

Not mentioned
Quality of written content:
Quality of shoes are properly visible
Quality of Visual Content:
Good and attractive
Alt Text used:

16Alt text attributes.
Captions used:

Not available
Quality of Layout:

The background is very good and attractive of the page
Call-to-action:

Not Available
Mobile Friendly:

Website is mobile friendly as there is no fake objects found.
Content is “shareable”:

Sharing option is available.
Links to Social Media:

Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGeF4vf9K1A
SERP ranking
88% out of 100


Reebok Website




URL
www.reebok.ca/on/demandware.store/Sites-Reebok-CA-Site/en_CA/Default-Start?&cm_mmc=RbkSEM_google_ecom-_-Trademark-_-Core-Exact-_-reebok&cm_mmca1=CA&cm_mmca2=e
Keywords used on each site:
Athletic shoes, formal shoes, Sneakers
Frequency of Keywords:
Almost8
Locations of keywords
Left corner
Keywords in URL:

Athletic shoes, formal shoes, Sneakers
<title>

Reebok Shoes
<meta name="description" content=“”/>
<meta name="description" content="Shop Reebok CrossFit Shoes and Apparel, ZQuick and Training Gear from the Reebok Canada Official Website. Free Shipping and Returns on All Orders."/>

<meta name="keywords" content=""/>
Not available in the source
Site upload speed:

Not mentioned
Quality of written content:
Quality is not similar to other one
Quality of Visual Content:
Unique designs are available
Alt Text used:

14Alt text attributes.
Captions used:

Not available
Quality of Layout:

Color combination of the webpage is very nice
Call-to-action:

Not Available
Mobile Friendly:

Site is only available on laptops not on the phone
Content is “shareable”:

Sharing option is available.
Links to Social Media:

Facebook
Twitter
YouTube

SERP ranking
70% out of 100

Summary:

For Puma, their main strengths that impacts their image they made on their webpage which attract the people to buy their product as compare to Reebok and on the other hand Reebok has good color combination and have unique design in their brand which attract the people to buy their product. The keywords for both the brands are same for example Athletic Shoes, Sneakers except Formal Shoes Reebok sells very less product in Formal Shoes as compare to Puma.

Conclusion:

Overall, both Puma and Reebok had great impact on their customer’s minds. But talking about the popularity I think Puma is the winner of the SEO search analysis as their website is more organized and their background and SERP ranking is also more than the Reebok as you can see above.